This worksheet uses the property of energy called the heat of combustion or heat of explosion and is expressed in units of kilocalories per gram. So it depends on how much anti-matter you have. There is no nuclear bomb that comes close to the power this bomb would have. Safety, Health & Environmental Affairs Committee, Transportation, Distribution & Security Committee. MathJax reference. Would it just be a stupidly bright flash? thanks for the detailed answer! The fictional bomb works by touching 1 gram of matter to 1 gram of antimatter a substance made of sub-atomic particles with properties opposite those of normal matter particles causing. Particles of both antimatter and matter were created. Antimatter is the opposite of matter. Could a subterranean river or aquifer generate enough continuous momentum to power a waterwheel for the purpose of producing electricity? Counting and finding real solutions of an equation. Matter-antimatter annihilation from a hypothetical macroscopic explosion would produce the same particles as proton-antiproton annihilation in microscopic quantities in accelerator experiments. rev2023.5.1.43405. For Starship, using B9 and later, how will separation work if the Hydrualic Power Units are no longer needed for the TVC System? Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Also your question only speaks about blowing up a planet completely, whereas my questions number 1 and 2 only speak about killing all humans and all animals respectively which is very different (your question very clearly states near the end "I dont just want to destroy all life on the surface, I want to reduce the entire planet to rubble so that very little remains"). As radioisotopes in bananasdecay, they release pairs of electrons and anti-electrons. A positron powered spaceship would be simpler, and less dangerous than say a nuclear powered spaceship which comes with a lot more complications. $361,000,000 km^2$ to cover, you'd need another 3,009 MIEVs. It seems like 2, 200kg antimatter bombs, in short succession, dropped into the Yellowstone Caldera would be fairly certain to ignite a life ending volcanic eruption saving a trillion tons of antimatter, more or less. The ton of TNT is a unit of energy defined by that convention to be 4.184 gigajoules, [1] which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a metric ton (1,000 kilograms) of TNT. Scientists have trouble finding antimatter however it can be created for a hefty price. Convert that into mass using $E=mc^2$ and we get $8.13710^6 kg$ divide by 2 because half that mass is coming from regular matter and we have $4.06910^6 kg$. None. Has the cause of a rocket failure ever been mis-identified, such that another launch failed due to the same problem? Space Mechs or Tanks or Planes or Marines - Fighting in space without blowing up each other's starships. $3.6567*10^{18}kJ*K^{-1} * 200K=7.31310^{20} kJ$. When the Tsar Bomba was tested in Russia it produced such a large fireball that it could be seen from 620 miles away. What could humans do to render the earth uninhabitable? The recipe they use at CERN's Antimatter Factory to achieve this feat is: 1. "Perhaps, just under four billion years ago, the Earth could have been hit by asteroids up to 400 kilometers across, forty times bigger than the one that is supposed to have been responsible for the K/T extinctions. The worlds most powerful nuke ever created was the Tsar Bomba. Now you can destroy all life on earth using only about 6E4 kg of antimatter, only 60 metric tons of the good stuff. The pressure decays exponentially over time and has positive and negative (suction) phases. Number 3 just a really big bang deep down. But that would miss all the boats, planes and submarines crowding their primitive buoyancy based transportation lanes. This is becoming more and more obvious as time goes by. There is such a thing as an antimatter trap. [3], As of 2004[update], the cost of producing one millionth of a gram of antimatter was estimated at US $60 billion. The very find dust gets around the problem that a chunk of antimatter in the presence of ordinary matter acts a bit like a chunk of sodium dropped into water. The total solar irradiance energy received by Earth in the upper atmosphere per hour. [1] By way of comparison, the cost of the Manhattan Project (to produce the first atomic bomb) is estimated at US$23 billion in 2007 prices. But why do so many Christians still claim that God used the Big Bang to create the universe, especially when this scientifically bankrupt speculation contradicts the Genesis creation account in so many ways?5 The Big Bang is, and always has been, unsupported speculation. Unfortunately that is rather slow, so a few humans will likely survive in bunkers you don't know about, for quite a long time. The explosive energy of a quantity of TNT of the. In all honesty you can probably get away with less because the force of the explosion will likely kill many humans. It's also likely the most explosive substance on the planet. "You need 2,000 times more energy to make [anti-protons]," he says. From some rough calculations with 10g of anti hydrogen, I came out at roughly a gigatonne of TNT's worth of energy - 1.2x10^22J. (On a much bigger scale to be sure -- it's not a good thing to have around the neighborhood.). 10 grams of antimatter will annihilate 10 g matter, which just produces 429.6 kT. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. This service may include material from Agence France-Presse (AFP), APTN, Reuters, AAP, CNN and the BBC World Service which is copyright and cannot be reproduced. $10^{32}J$ is simply the gravitational binding energy of the planet. The main hurdles are the production and storage of large amounts of antimatter. [3], The kiloton and megaton of TNT equivalent have traditionally been used to describe the energy output, and hence the destructive power, of a nuclear weapon. religious interview questions and answers sharleen spiteri ashley heath . Professor Doser leads a team studying this strange, expensive, explosive stuffin the wonderfully named Antimatter Factory. Using the convention that 1 kiloton TNT equivalent = 4.18410 12 joules (or one trillion calories of energy), one half gram of antimatter reacting with one half gram of ordinary matter (one gram total) results in 21.5 kilotons-equivalent of energy (the same as the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945). This result is only bizarre for someone who has a prior commitment to the Big Bang model. When the antimatter starts reacting antiprotons and positrons will be kicked away, mixing with the air. The latter's decay chains include neutrinos, which of course, carry energy away harmlessly. A boy can regenerate, so demons eat him for years. What differentiates living as mere roommates from living in a marriage-like relationship? Given a pair of explosives, one can produce 2 the shockwave output (this depends on the distance of measuring instruments) but the difference in direct metal cutting ability may be 4 higher for one type of metal and 7 higher for another type of metal. Thankfully, outside the realms of science fiction, we won't see antimatter destroying cities anytime soon. We must use a bigger bomb. But this result isnt bizarre at allits simply a confirmation of earlier, but less precise, measurements of the antiprotons magnetic moment. To create antimatter you just need to create matter. Electron + positron = 2 * gamma going opposite directions and having nearly the same energy of electron + positron mass-energies. Indeed this is a polar-explosion (1 gamma to one side and the other to opposite side). I went to wolframalpha.com, and typed in this. He says an alternative hypothesis is that we're living in a part of the Universe filled with matter but other parts might be full of antimatter. It is a spherical or hemispherical-shaped wave that originates upon the detonation of explosives. The Big Bang is, and always has been, unsupported speculation. Use this specific gravity calculator to find the specific gravity of different materials and see whether they will float or sink. It's the only way to be sure. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Comparing with nuclear weapons, this is about 50 kton TNT. Big Bang scientists have long claimed that some unknown physics somehow allowed a slightly greater amount of primordial normal matter to be produced, and this leftover normal matter eventually became the material stuff of the universe. The positron has the same mass as an electron but with a positive charge, rather than negative. If you really need to do this on the cheap, a 400 km asteroid is really quite a bit of overkill and a 100 km asteroid is probably enough to kill all animal life big enough to be interesting to most people although it may not completely sterilize the earth, and your only need 1 metric ton to target earth. . I have no idea how to get that in an antimatter bomb, because of the fizzle problem noted above. The recipethey use at CERN's Antimatter Factory to achieve this feat is: One in every million collisions creates a proton-antiproton pair. Likewise, the antimatter counterpart to a proton is the anti-proton which has the same mass as a proton but with a negative charge. The team hasn't found any other meaningful differences between matter and antimatter. $<< 10^{32}J$ (gravitational binding energy of Earth), We must use an even bigger bomb. (W/W) = (R/R). But case 2 deserves a better answer after all anti-matter is not cheap and they are always out of stock at Home Depot. The bottle is called a trap because thats what it does, it traps antimatter. The energy released by a hurricane per day during condensation. The scaling law is a convenient way to estimate the properties of a large explosion using the data from smaller explosions. Indiana Jones level kill you immediately radiation dosage is about 100000 rads, so that's about 290,000 kg of antiprotons spread out evenly. Why refined oil is cheaper than cold press oil? Its easy to see why secularists, desperate to explain their existence apart from a Creator, would cling to such fantastic notions. Why 1.810 14 joules? By Snell's law, determine the incident angle by using our angle of incidence calculator. Given that 1 ton is equal to 2240 pounds or 1016.046909 kg we should be able to scale up the explosive yield simply. Professor Doser and his colleagues need anti-protons. 1 megaton is about 4.2x10 15 J. The TNT equivalent appears in various nuclear weapon control treaties, and has been used to characterize the energy released in asteroid impacts. The TNT explosion radius becomes: In case of ranges where the public access is denied, the blast radius becomes: Energy from different sources The reaction of 1 kg of antimatter with 1 kg of matter would produce 1.8 10 17 J (180 petajoules) of energy (by the mass-energy equivalence formula, E=mc 2), or the rough equivalent of 43 megatons of TNT - slightly less than the yield of the 27,000 kg Tsar Bomba, the largest thermonuclear weapon ever detonated. Actually, its even worse than that, because matter and antimatter particles annihilate one another whenever they come into contact!
Retracted Eardrum And Flying,
Stalekracker Real Hair,
Spotting After Period Ended Could I Be Pregnant,
Articles OTHER